Baidu acquisition of 360 yuan sentenced the case was sentenced to infringement compensation of 50 t
NetEase Francisco March 25th message, because micro-blog forwarding Fang allegedly bought Baidu, the search giant is a crazy money competitors do negative remarks, Baidu reputation infringement grounds of Beijing Qihoo and its chairman Zhou Hongyi to court. Recently, the Haidian court ruling on the case, that although the Beijing Qihoo and Zhou Hongyi claims related to the actual situation of speech source, friends broke the news, but the release of micro-blog content was edited and the words change, there are some subjective intent, the Beijing Qihoo and Zhou Hongyi sentenced to infringement, compensation for economic loss of fifty thousand yuan of Baidu Inc.
the naming dispute originated in the dispute between 360 and Baidu. August 2012, 360 launched search engine so.com, officially announced into the search field, and Baidu compete. Immediately, there are a lot of rumors on the Internet 360 browser to steal user privacy.
began in mid October 2012, Fang Fang publicly declared that 360 security browser is not safe, forwarding related micro-blog, said the 360 browser to steal user privacy. At the same time, Baidu prominently in its news site to the red eye to be spread.
then, Beijing Qihoo responded and released Baidu discredit 360 security browser contain 360 search, will be futile "and" suggestions that claimed that "no money is charged for Baidu ‘Dr. Fang read Andersen’s fairy tale" the emperor’s new clothes "," micro-blog said in a statement, at the same time, Zhou Hongyi also said: "micro-blog a milk laced with melamine, the search company rich forces behind public opinion disinformation 360, adhering to its founder turtles really like the style".
in this regard, Baidu believes Zhou Hongyi micro-blog called "a milk laced with melamine, the search company" is the derogatory, violated its reputation and taken to court, asking them to remove the infringing micro-blog information, published a letter of apology and compensation for economic losses of 10 million yuan.
after the trial, Haidian court held that the Beijing Qihoo and Zhou Hongyi claims related to the actual situation of speech source, friends broke the news, and provide evidence that the outsider had issued false reports "360 attacks on the Internet, Fang", "Baidu allegedly bribed Chinese search giant is heard some crazy money competitors do negative" article or speech. But from the word meaning analysis, micro-blog released obviously on his theory of editing and dialect words change and comment or ask, there are some subjective intent, the reason does not constitute the excusatio of infringement of right of reputation of Baidu WebEX Inc.
finally, the court of Beijing Qihoo and Zhou Hongyi Baidu reputation infringement facts established, the Baidu Inc joint compensation for economic loss of fifty thousand yuan, dismissed the other claims of the Baidu Inc. (Gu Xiaobo)